Hi Again:

I favor a 1030 to 1050 weight limit . . . but would not oppose 1000#. That extra 30#s to 1030 makes crew selection no sweat . . . and no one will have to diet before a weight imposed resgatta.

MB

:: I also vote to re-examine this wieght limit thing. I
:: also like 1000#. As I and my friends get older, its
:: harder to stay under 880. My female crew member is in
:: the Olson Nationals in Tahoe so I'm stuck with 185 to
:: 210 guys!
::
::
::
:: :: The weight limit is screwed up and always has been since
:: :: improsed. I suggest it be dropped.
:: ::
:: :: It makes it tough to find a steady crew. And, as far as
:: :: I could see, only is enforced at the NA regionals.
:: ::
:: :: The weight limit, which was originally open, was always
:: :: fine by me. That means no matter who jumped int he class
:: :: at a higher weight tuned to a specific regatta
:: :: condition.
::
:: :: #1050 to 1100#s is an the ideal total crew weight all
:: :: around (upwind + downwind) weight. Some tried 1200#s
:: :: when the fleet still did triangles (which I happento
:: :: like) and did well when it blew. However, 1200#s is
:: :: markedly slow on the downwind run of windward leeward
:: :: courses.
:: ::
:: :: After the open weight limit, the 1000# was imposed. Then
:: :: dropped to #880; the same as a J24 go figure.
:: ::
:: :: Politically, this weight was pushed on the class by
:: :: Steve Lake, Ralph Morgan, and others who or are members
:: :: of the Pinneaple Sails Coalition.
:: ::
:: :: Members of this ancient (1988) voting block no longer
:: :: have boats, or sail at all.
:: ::
:: :: I suggest the weight limit be reexamined. I personally
:: :: would vote for its elimination entirely.
:: ::
:: :: Mike Bruzzone