Sorry about that errant post... I meant to reply to Bob--

We are working on this issue. There will be an interpretation issued. And later we may have a vote to further change it. You should see the initial interpretation soon.

Mark

::
:: I will refer the last thread I posted with the simple
:: suggestion,
::
:: "Okay, here is my proposal on this. What would be the
:: problem with simply eliminating Part A of 'Prohibitions'
:: in the class rules? That would move B up to A an so on
:: down the line.
::
:: Any opinions?"
::
:: Would not that be simple and not require Will nor anyone
:: else to rewrite anything?
::
:: Just my 2.