Elite Keel at San Francisco Yacht Club | May 18 - 19 |
Story |
Congratulations to Dianne with their win in the Elite Keel Regatta.
Here is Steve's Top Ten List that he has submitted for publication. ELITE KEEL STORY-A LIST OF TEN THINGS THAT HELPED DIANNE 1) The crew: Jarian Westfall, Laurel Schmidt, Mike Pastrone, Jeff Fellicetti 2) Will Paxton wasn't there. 3) This crew can change head sails, the hanked kind, in less then 2.3 minutes. 4) Wilie E Coyote didn't race Sunday. 5) Sun was shining. 6) It was my birthday weekend. 7. El Raton wasn't there. 8. We went left when we could. 9. The wind was blowing. 10. This crew has 59 combined years sailing with me. |
Result | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Regatta Message Board |
Reply | Post New Message | All Messages | this message is spam |
Author: Ralph Deeds Subject: Crew Weight Change Info: (20582 views) Posted: Tuesday 12-18-07 07:09:02 AM |
In my opinion, a better way to go would be to drop the 150 % genoa and allow instead two non-overlapping headsails--One small #3 for heavy air and another more powerful, but non-overlapping jib for light air. This would make the boat much more fun to sail. There's nothing I enjoy less about the boat than sailing it above 12 knots with the #1. Nearly all of the newer, popular classes and designs have fractional rigs and non-overlapping jibs.
:: I will weight in here for a bit (pun intended). I am in
:: favor of a change in crew weight limit up to 1000 lbs.
:: as that was the original crew weight Carl designed the
:: boat to carry. Not being a mathematician I will not
:: attempt to argue numbers except to say that the
:: difference of 100 lbs. that Mike speaks of does not seem
:: to me to be such an additional stress on the boat, but a
:: lot less stress on the skipper to put a crew together
:: consistently. I am still having a very difficult time
:: picking up the diehard logic of the crew weight needing
:: to be 880 lbs. I have never seen nor heard any logic for
:: that particular number. It seems to me that Mike's
:: number of 980 lbs. is at best reasonable and at least
:: based upon some use of arithmetic. I second Mike's
:: motion to change the crew weight to 980 lbs.
::
:: Does this motion have any standing, anyway. If so, let's
:: vote on it.
Reply | Post New Message | All Messages | this message is spam |
|