Elite Keel at San Francisco Yacht Club | May 18 - 19 |
Story |
Congratulations to Dianne with their win in the Elite Keel Regatta.
Here is Steve's Top Ten List that he has submitted for publication. ELITE KEEL STORY-A LIST OF TEN THINGS THAT HELPED DIANNE 1) The crew: Jarian Westfall, Laurel Schmidt, Mike Pastrone, Jeff Fellicetti 2) Will Paxton wasn't there. 3) This crew can change head sails, the hanked kind, in less then 2.3 minutes. 4) Wilie E Coyote didn't race Sunday. 5) Sun was shining. 6) It was my birthday weekend. 7. El Raton wasn't there. 8. We went left when we could. 9. The wind was blowing. 10. This crew has 59 combined years sailing with me. |
Result | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Regatta Message Board |
Reply | Post New Message | All Messages | this message is spam |
Author: Terry Stuck ([email protected]) contact the author Subject: CLASS RULES Info: (20733 views) Posted: Wednesday 12-5-01 07:33:00 AM |
There appears to be a shortened version of the Class Rules on our web site.
I was discussing "Life Lines" with Frank Poupore #25 and made the claim that life lines were not required. He said they were.
I was citing rules I had received when I bought my boat and the Rules in my 1993 owners manual Article V Minimum Equipment, Para.D. Life lines clearly says, "Life lines are not required." "If they are used, they must meet the following criteria:"
Our discussion led me to look further. I found another set of "Rules" without a date, attached to an advertisement "Victory At Sea" without a date that clearly says, "Life lines ARE required (with the same criteria except for a "d." entry requiring "CONTINUOUS" from the aft stanchion to the bow pulpit) yikes!
Two issues. One, why are the entire Class Rules not on the web site and two, dated to assure they are current?
As a footnote, the deflection requirement appears prohibitive especially with today's high strength line available and I don't think one boat in the Detroit Fleet would meet it, further non-continuous seems to be a better "safety" requirement if that is the reason for the life lines.
On the other hand, if the requirement is merely to prevent bodily 'hiking'(ie bent outboard, assuming the stanchion bent)then why not clarify the rule?
Can the stanchions be replaced with a different design? Freezing pockets have caused mid-western boats havoc by cracking the hull retainer hole and allowing water into the core. Not a good situation.
Thanks for any thoughts..............Terry
Reply | Post New Message | All Messages | this message is spam |
|