Delta Ditch Run at Stockton Sailing Club/Richmond Yacht ClubJune 12
Story
Congratulations to Get Happy!!
Recap by Brendan Busch


Aerial Photos by H20 Shots
Result
PosBoatTotalRace 1
1Get Happy!!11
2Magic Bus22
3Shenanigans33
4Light'n Up44
5Discotheque55
6Dianne66
7Take Five77
8Opa!88
9Peaches99
10Desperado1010
11Libra11DNF
11El Raton11DNF
11Archimedes11DNF
11Expressway11DNF
11Scandalous11DNF
11Elise11DNS
export csv

Regatta Message Board

Reply | Post New Message | All Messages | this message is spam
Author: Ralph Deeds
Subject: PHRF rating and Penalty poles
Info: (20149 views) Posted: Friday 8-18-06 09:47:55 PM

In Detroit some of us race JAM a couple of evenings a week. Our Detroit PHRF base rating is 144 and our one design rating is 138 due to a six second spinnaker pole penalty. For main and jib rating we have asked the sponsoring clubs for the 144 rating on the theory that why should we pay a 6-second spinnaker pole penalty when we aren't using spinnakers. We convinced the sponsoring clubs to give us the 144 jib and main rating. However, another boat in our class has complained on the basis that we do benefit from from the long pole when we use it as a whisker pole to wing out the #1 genoa or #3 jib. The issue remains unresolved. We've pointed out a couple of big boats we race against who use collapsible whisker poles that look like they are longer than the J dimension. As a result we're saying that if the committee is going to give us a 6-second pole penalty, to be fair, they should measure all the poles that are in use in the evening races. They haven't done that and we are still racing with a 144 rating. The RC has proposed a 3-second penalty for us, as a compromise, instead of 6 seconds. Basically PHRF racing sucks, in my opinion. Politics get into the ratings and the spread between the high and low boats is too wide for good results.

Reply | Post New Message | All Messages | this message is spam