Three Bridge Fiasco (Doublehanded) at Singlehanded Sailing SocietyJanuary 30
Story
Fantastic day during the Three Bridge and Great turn out with 25 e27s participating.
SSS TBF Trophy Meeting Oakland Yacht Club, 7:30 pm Wednesday, February 10th.

Congratulations to the winners!

DH : El Raton (6th out of 284 overall) Recap by Ray
SH : TAZ!! (1st out of 41 overall) Recap by George
Result
PosBoatTotalRace 1
1El Raton11
2Shenanigans22
3Witchy Woman33
4Chile Dog44
5Peaches55
6Wile E Coyote66
7Light'n Up77
8Verve88
9Take Five99
10Taz!!1010
11Ergo1111
12Abigail Morgan1212
13Desperado1313
14Magic1414
15Magic Bus1515
16Thumper1616
17Dianne1717
18Opa!1818
19Get Happy!!20DNF
19Moxie20DNF
19Swampdonkey20DNF
19Attack From Mars20DNF
19Wetsu20DNF
19Mirage20DNF
19Discotheque20DNS
19Elise20DNS
export csv

Regatta Message Board

Reply | Post New Message | All Messages | this message is spam
Author: Mike Bruzzone ([email protected]) contact the author
Subject: Crew Weight Change / #2
Info: (27714 views) Posted: Tuesday 12-18-07 10:14:23 AM
Hi Bob:

I've had a #2 in the past primarily for short handed/doublehanded sailing and the 6 seconds allowed under PHRF moving the rating to 135.

These sails were primarily sold around here to do the doublehanded Farrallons race. And some boats used them on the long down hill runs including Coastal Cup for that rating advantage. They were also used on the Ditch Run until outlawed by the race committee for this particular race which is 90% down wind; most of the time.

#2s do work well enough upwind when the boat is limited to 4 crew. Otherwise with 5 crew, they have a very narrow range of wind conditions and in my opinion are a waste of time vs going directkly from #1 to #3.

Personally, I enjoy sailign with the #1 in the top of its range on E27 with 5 (and even up to 6) crew for PHRF. And, for the Fun Series (depite the strategy of that series) would prefer to continue racing with the #1.

Mike

:: Ralph, thanks for the clarification. I was told when I
:: first got my boat that the original crew weight from
:: Carl was 1000 lbs. I believe you would know the real
:: facts. Still I agree with Mike's argument that a 980 lb.
:: weight rule makes much more sense from a management
:: perspective and will not appreciably stress the boats,
:: as some are concerned.
::
:: I don't mind your suggestion of sail changes, either. I
:: know from past experience with some other, larger, ULDBs
:: that they did not sail well upwind with a #2. Have you
:: sailed an E27 with a #2? If so what was the performance
:: difference?

Reply | Post New Message | All Messages | this message is spam