Three Bridge Fiasco (Doublehanded) at Singlehanded Sailing SocietyJanuary 30
Story
Fantastic day during the Three Bridge and Great turn out with 25 e27s participating.
SSS TBF Trophy Meeting Oakland Yacht Club, 7:30 pm Wednesday, February 10th.

Congratulations to the winners!

DH : El Raton (6th out of 284 overall) Recap by Ray
SH : TAZ!! (1st out of 41 overall) Recap by George
Result
PosBoatTotalRace 1
1El Raton11
2Shenanigans22
3Witchy Woman33
4Chile Dog44
5Peaches55
6Wile E Coyote66
7Light'n Up77
8Verve88
9Take Five99
10Taz!!1010
11Ergo1111
12Abigail Morgan1212
13Desperado1313
14Magic1414
15Magic Bus1515
16Thumper1616
17Dianne1717
18Opa!1818
19Get Happy!!20DNF
19Moxie20DNF
19Swampdonkey20DNF
19Attack From Mars20DNF
19Wetsu20DNF
19Mirage20DNF
19Discotheque20DNS
19Elise20DNS
export csv

Regatta Message Board

Reply | Post New Message | All Messages | this message is spam
Author: Terry Stuck ([email protected]) contact the author
Subject: CLASS RULES
Info: (20953 views) Posted: Wednesday 12-5-01 07:33:00 AM

There appears to be a shortened version of the Class Rules on our web site.

I was discussing "Life Lines" with Frank Poupore #25 and made the claim that life lines were not required. He said they were.

I was citing rules I had received when I bought my boat and the Rules in my 1993 owners manual Article V Minimum Equipment, Para.D. Life lines clearly says, "Life lines are not required." "If they are used, they must meet the following criteria:"

Our discussion led me to look further. I found another set of "Rules" without a date, attached to an advertisement "Victory At Sea" without a date that clearly says, "Life lines ARE required (with the same criteria except for a "d." entry requiring "CONTINUOUS" from the aft stanchion to the bow pulpit) yikes!

Two issues. One, why are the entire Class Rules not on the web site and two, dated to assure they are current?

As a footnote, the deflection requirement appears prohibitive especially with today's high strength line available and I don't think one boat in the Detroit Fleet would meet it, further non-continuous seems to be a better "safety" requirement if that is the reason for the life lines.

On the other hand, if the requirement is merely to prevent bodily 'hiking'(ie bent outboard, assuming the stanchion bent)then why not clarify the rule?

Can the stanchions be replaced with a different design? Freezing pockets have caused mid-western boats havoc by cracking the hull retainer hole and allowing water into the core. Not a good situation.

Thanks for any thoughts..............Terry

Reply | Post New Message | All Messages | this message is spam