Spring Keel at St. Francis Yacht ClubMarch 3 - 4
Result
PosBoatTotalRace 1Race 2Race 3
1Witchy Woman6213
2Motorcycle Irene9126
3Baffett10631
4Wile E Coyote15744
5Magic Bus17458
6Xena18972
7El Raton193115
8Moxie20569
9Bessie Jay3112127
10Mirage3111911
11Peaches3214810
12Elise35131012
13Kolibri3781415
14Opa!39101514
14Wild Mojo41151313
15Radio Flyer4916DNF16
export csv

Regatta Message Board

Reply | Post New Message | All Messages | this message is spam
Author: Ralph Deeds
Subject: PHRF rating and Penalty poles
Info: (19942 views) Posted: Friday 8-18-06 09:47:55 PM

In Detroit some of us race JAM a couple of evenings a week. Our Detroit PHRF base rating is 144 and our one design rating is 138 due to a six second spinnaker pole penalty. For main and jib rating we have asked the sponsoring clubs for the 144 rating on the theory that why should we pay a 6-second spinnaker pole penalty when we aren't using spinnakers. We convinced the sponsoring clubs to give us the 144 jib and main rating. However, another boat in our class has complained on the basis that we do benefit from from the long pole when we use it as a whisker pole to wing out the #1 genoa or #3 jib. The issue remains unresolved. We've pointed out a couple of big boats we race against who use collapsible whisker poles that look like they are longer than the J dimension. As a result we're saying that if the committee is going to give us a 6-second pole penalty, to be fair, they should measure all the poles that are in use in the evening races. They haven't done that and we are still racing with a 144 rating. The RC has proposed a 3-second penalty for us, as a compromise, instead of 6 seconds. Basically PHRF racing sucks, in my opinion. Politics get into the ratings and the spread between the high and low boats is too wide for good results.

Reply | Post New Message | All Messages | this message is spam